Islamabad High Court Order of case Crl.Org.W-205/2012 Dated 01-10-2012 Telecom Union Vs PTCL

Islamabad High Court Order of case Crl.Org.W-205/2012 Dated 01-10-2012 Telecom Union Vs PTCL

High Court ordered PTCL President & CEO to appear in person on October 16, 2012.


Text of order

Form No: HCJD/C-121





Pak Telecom Labour Union etc


Waleed Irshad & 2 others.

S. No. of   order/proceedings    Date of  order/Proceedings

Order with signature of Judge and that of parties   or counsel where necessary.

01.10.2012      Hafiz Arfat Ahmed Chaudhry, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Muhammad  Munir  Paracha,  Advocate  for respondents.


Contempt of Court Reply – IHC notices to PTCL CEO and others for 16-102012 (Daily Jang Rawalpindi dated 03/10/2012)

Learned  counsel  appearing for PTCL separately filed miscellaneous application eeking

modification of order dated 14.9.2012 and drawn my attention towards a portion of said order. While passing the said order respondents were required to submit their reply within a period of fifteen days else appear in person before the Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not moved instant CM on behalf of PTCL being incompetent person who has no authority to submit reply on behalf of respondent in criminal original    but  submit   a    separate   CM    for modification of order dated 14.9.2012. To the

extent of portion of order dated 14.9.2012 when an application moved by learned counsel for the Debboner, a general written order was passed.

PTCL has an authority to agitate by making a separate CM, therefore, this CM entertained by this Court. While entertaining the CM moved by the official of PTCL, this Court vide order dated 20.9.2012 clarified the position that the authorities have to confine themselves only to the extent of sub-section 13 of section 19 IRA 2012 which is in fact the sense of the original order now passed in the instant criminal original i.e order dated 27.6.2012. The said order speaks that no adverse action shall be initiated against any of the employee or office bearer of trade union does not include all the employees of PTCL. Therefore, vide order dated 20.9.2012 whereby clouds created over entire proceedings initiated from its commencement is removed. Hence, instant CM in view of clarification vide order dated 20.9.2012 stands disposed off. The respondents since have not submitted their reply to the directions vide order dated  14.9.2012,

therefore,   they  shall  appear  in   person   on 16.10.2012 as they were required to submit their reply within fifteen days which they have not filed.

Islamabad High Court Order 01-10-2012 Telecom Union Vs PTCL

Islamabad High Court Order 01-10-2012 Telecom Union Vs PTCL 2



  1. Malik Khuda Bux says:

    ZIA,SANGI,LALA & Ghazali ko waziristan transfer karo.

  2. Imran Bangulzai Mastung Balochistan says:

    Jb Tak Zia H. Ptcl employees ko kuch b nahi milay ga.
    Employees zindabad.

  3. Malik Noor Din E.S Jacobabad says:

    PTCL Employees ka kon Sochay Ga?.

Leave a Reply