PTCL Pensioners case in Peshawar High Court dated 11 Nov 2016

PTCL Pensioners case in Peshawar High Court dated 11 Nov 2016
Peshawar High Court, Peshawar
Present:- Mr. Salahuddin Khan, advocate for petitioner. Mr. Nouman Munir Paracha, advocate for respondent No.3. It is deplorable state of affair, rather unfortunate and disturbing on the part of respondents that the petitioners are still waiting for implementation of judgement rendered by this court in writ petition No. 2036-P/2012 dated 03.07.2014, while the respondents are persistently dilly dallying the payment of unpaid pensionary arrears of the petitioners on one or other pretext. On previous date i.e. 15.6.2016, the respondents were directed in unequivocal terms to implement the judgement in letter and spit but of no avail and today the learned counsel for respondents vehemently urged that they have filed a review petition before the august Supreme Court of Pakistan which is pending adjudication. He also stated out that due to certain anomaly with regard to the allocation of fund, the arrears in pension could not be arranged which must require some time.
2. We have noted with great concern, the lackadaisical attitude of respondents towards non-implementation of judgement of this court as well august Supreme Court of Pakistan. However without making recourse to the provision of Contempt of Court Act 1976 read with Article 204 of Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan,1973 and by showing clemency and taking lenient view, provide last chance to the respondent/contemnors for implementation of judgement of this court failing which the law shall take its own course. To come up for further
proceedings on 12.1.2017.

پشاور ہائی کورٹ میں توہین عدالت کیس کی سماعت مورخہ 11-نومبر 2016 کو ہوئی جس میں پی۔ٹی۔سی۔ایل کے وکیل اس بات پر مصر رہے کہ چونکہ سپریم کورٹ میں نظرثانی کی درخواستیں زیر سماعت ہیں لہذا ہائی کورٹ میں اس کی سماعت ملتوی کر دی جائے اور یہ کہ پنشنرز کو ادائیگیوں کے لئے خطیر رقم درکار ہے جو جلد ممکن نہیں۔
عدالت عالیہ کا حکم اس حوالے سے بہت واضح ہے کہ آخری موقع دیا جاتا ہے کہ عدالتی فیصلہ پر من و عن عمل کیا جائے ورنہ قانون اپنا راستہ بنائے گا۔
جناب اکرام اللہ،کنوینر آل پاکستان پی۔ٹی۔سی۔ایل پنشنرز ایکشن کمیٹی اور جناب صادق علی،ڈپٹی کنوینر عدالت عالیہ پشاور و عدالت عظمی’ میں پنشن مقدمات کی پیروی کر رہے ہیں۔ان کی کاوشیں قابل تحسین ہیں۔ اللہ انکو استقامت عطا فرمائے اور ان پر اپنا خصوصی کرم فرمائے۔

محمد توقیر
ڈپٹی کنوینر
APPPAC

 


ptcl-pensioners-case-in-peshawar-high-court-11-nov-2016-a

ptcl-pensioners-case-in-peshawar-high-court-11-nov-2016-b

One Comment

  1. M.Q.SIDDIQUI says:

    PTCL COUNSEL SUBMIT IN HSP, LHC ORDER DURING HEARING OF SUO MOTO PENSIONERS CASE. MR.M.H.ASLAM OR ANY FORUM CAN ALSO SUBMIT PHC ORDER FOR CLARIFICATION. PTCL COUNSEL TELL A LIE BEFORE HSP DURING HEARING. THERE IS NO AGREEMENT BETWEEN PTCL & PTCL PENSIONERS. PTCL PENSIONERS DRAWN PENSION AS PER LAW UPTO 2009-2010. FROM 2010-2011 TILL NOW PTCL-ETISALAT & PTET NOT PAYING PENSION IN ACCORDANCE LAW & HSP ORDERS.

Leave a Reply